POWER AND CONSEQUENCES SYMBOLISM IN FRANKENSTEIN

Main Article Content

Rifky Ali Perdiansyah
Muhammad Al Afghani
Elza Salsabillah Arriyaha Lawaqih Taufik
Nurholis Nurholis

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of symbolism in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, illustrates how Shelley uses various symbols as a form of social criticism of the moral degradation when scientific exploration is separated from ethical considerations. Through several symbols, the novel highlighting the dangers of ambition uncontrolled by moral limitations. The symbol that show on the monster, represent dangerous consequences of uncontrolled scientific ambition. Victor Frankenstein, as the creator, crosses moral and ethical boundaries by creating life without considering his responsibilities. Also, the nature elements that Shelley uses is shown as an example how the quest for knowledge can lead to disaster, warning readers of the moral responsibility that comes with science. This study explores how the novel uses symbols to reflects concept of man and the responsibility of the creator emphasize how important it is to consider the moral and social implications of every action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rifky Ali Perdiansyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Muhammad Al Afghani, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Elza Salsabillah Arriyaha Lawaqih Taufik, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Nurholis Nurholis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

References

Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Sukabumi: CV Jejak.

Brännström, C. (2006). An Analysis of the Theme of Alienation on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Luleå University of Technology, Department of Language and Culture. Retrieved on December 9, 2024, from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1016264/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum. doi: 10.21831/hum.v21i1. 38075.33-54

Prose, F. (2016). Frankenstein or The Modern Promotheus by Mary Shelley. New York: Restless Classics Publishing.

Levine, G. (1996). The endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley's novel. University of California Press.

Mellor, A. K. (1988). Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. New York: Routledge Publishing.

Newman, B. (1995). Narratives of seduction and the seductions of narrative: The Frame Structure of Frankenstein. ELH, 53(1), 141-163. Sparknotes. Frankenstein Symbolism.

Shelley, M. (1818). Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones.

Wolfson, S.J., & Levao, R. (2012). The Annotated Frankenstein.