AN ANALYSIS OF CONNOTATION AND DENOTATION IN UNPAM VIKTOR’S SIGNS USING BARTHES MODEL
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
This study examines the connotation and denotation of signs at UNPAM Viktor using Barthes' semiotic model to explore their explicit and implicit meanings. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, the research analyzes 20 selected signs, highlighting their functional and symbolic roles within the campus environment. The findings reveal that these signs reflect the cultural, social, and institutional values of the university, serving as effective tools for communication and identity reinforcement. This study underscores the importance of Barthes' semiotic theory in interpreting signs in academic contexts and suggests further exploration of how cultural nuances and technological advancements influence sign interpretation.
Keywords: Connotation, Denotation, Barthes, Signs, Academic Environment, UNPAM Viktor, Semiotic Analysis
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Batubara, H., Rukiyah, S., & Utami, P. I. (2024). Analisis Semiotika: Pemaknaan Komunikasi Visual Pada Poster Iklan Layanan Masyarakat Di Media Digital. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research. 4(3). 6026-6042.
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Fardyan, H. F. (2023) SEMIOTIKA BAHASA PAMFLET DI LINGKUNGAN UNIVERSITAS NEGERI DI BANDUNG.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Sebeok, T. A. . (2001). Signs : an introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press.
Shapiro, B. (2015). Structures That Teach: Using a Semiotic Framework to Study the Environmental Messages of Learning Settings. University of Calgary. 1.
Tochon, F. V. (2013). SIGNS AND SYMBOLS IN EDUCATION: EDUCATIONAL SEMIOTICS.