DYNAMICS OF TRADEMARK LAW: A REVIEW OF THE CASE OF INTER IKEA SYSTEM B.V. VS. PT RATANIA KHATULISTIWA IN DECISION NO. 264 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015
Article Sidebar
trademark,
intellectual property rights,
trademark removal
Main Article Content
Abstract
Trademark can be interpreted as a naming or thing that can be used as a mention in a product. Trademark is included in one of the scope of Intellectual Property Rights. Intellectual Property Rights that can provide protection and legal certainty against a trademark. Without legal protection, the trademark will be very easy to imitate so as to cause harm to one party. This research focuses on the decision of the Supreme Court No. 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 which filed a trademark dispute between Inter IKEA System B.V. and PT Ratania Khatulistiwa. The two parties involved are the owner of the IKEA brand and the applicant for the IKEA brand. The purpose of this study is to analyze the judge's decision and the elements contained therein as well as outline the lawsuit application filed by the plaintiff. This research is made using the normative juridical method with secondary materials as the main material used. In the case between PT Ratania Khatulistiwa against Inter IKEA System B.V. both seek the brand "IKEA" as the brand they want to have.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abdurahman, H. (2020). Asas Fisrt To File Principal Dalam Kasus Hak Merek Nama Terkenal Bensu. Aktualita: Jurnal Hukum, 428-443.
Bafadhal, T. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia: Kasus IKEA. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 21-41.
R. E. Kalman, New results in linear filtering and prediction theory, J. Basic Eng., vol. 83, no. 3, pp.95-108, Juli 2018.
Denny, D., Liegestu, Y. P., Novika, N., & Patros, A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Di Indonesia: Studi Putusan. Sapientia Et Virtus, 7(2), 148-163.
Disastra, D. (2022). Pengaruh Citra Merek Dan Kepercayaan Merek Terhadap Loyalitas Merek. Journal Strategy of Management and Accounting Through Research and Technology (SMART), 1(2), 55-66.
Fajar, M., Nurhayati, Y., & Ifrani, I. (2018). Iktikad Tidak Baik dalam Pendaftaran dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 219-236.
Gaumi, SDA, & Hartono, R. (2022). Analisa Hukum Sengketa Merek Geprek Bensu Berdasarkan Kepastian Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 196/G/2020/PTUN-JKT). Jurnal Darma Agung , 30 (2), 75-90.
Gunawan, Y. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Terdaftar Dan Merek Terkenal Dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum. Iblam Law Review, 2(2), 141-164.
Karina, R. M. P., & Njatrijani, R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Ikea Atas Penghapusan Merek Dagang. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 194-212.
Khairani, N. H., Sari, A. R., Labina, M. S. T., Rahmandika, S. A., & Wijaya, M. M. (2024). Pendekatan Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Terkait Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang Merek (Sengketa IKEA PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia dan IKEA Swedia). Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(3), 11-11.
Rusmana, D., Saragih, B. R., & Bustani, S. (2023). Ownership Dispute Resolution Brand Ownership Rights In Indonesia. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(4), 269-277.
Urbanisasi, U., & Halim, H. (2023). Case Study of Geprek Bensu Franchising Disputes from Intellectual Property Legal Perspective. Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 2(10), 1128-1134.
Yogiswara, I. G. M., Lombok, L. L., Nur, A. I., Kumara, I. G. B. I., & Sutianti, N. N. S. P. (2022). Settlement of Brand Rights Disputes Through the Commercial Court in Indonesia: Study of Surabaya Court Decision. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(3), 299-308.