TEORI MODERNISASI DALAM EKONOMI POLITIK; ANALISIS FAKTOR KETERBELAKANGAN EKONOMI INDONESIA DALAM PERBANDINGAN DENGAN KOREA SELATAN

Main Article Content

Fathimah Syirin

Abstract

Indonesia and South Korea have contrasting economic trajectories despite their differences in natural resources. Indonesia, rich in natural resources, has not fully capitalized on its potential, while South Korea, with fewer resources, has emerged as a leading economic power. This study focuses on the role of human resources and policy in shaping these disparities, using modernization theory within political economy as the analytical lens. The research employs a qualitative comparative method, analyzing human capital development, economic policies, and institutional structures of both nations. Findings show that South Korea’s success is largely attributed to investments in human capital, education, and consistent, long-term economic policies that foster industrial growth. In contrast, Indonesia’s underdevelopment stems from challenges in education, weak institutional frameworks, and inconsistent policy implementation. The study concludes that Indonesia must focus on improving its human resources through better education, stronger institutions, and more coherent policies to harness its natural resources effectively and stimulate sustained economic growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fathimah Syirin. (2025). TEORI MODERNISASI DALAM EKONOMI POLITIK; ANALISIS FAKTOR KETERBELAKANGAN EKONOMI INDONESIA DALAM PERBANDINGAN DENGAN KOREA SELATAN. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 10(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v10i2.9574
Section
Articles

References

Ayunda Febri Kinanti, et al. “Analisis Pola Konsumsi Di Indonesia Sebagai Indikator Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat.” Digital Bisnis: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen Dan E-Commerce, vol. 3, no. 2, 2024, pp. 19–32.

Budiman Arif. 1995, Teoi pembartgunan Dunia Ketiga. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama Jakarta

Hindun Qurrotu Aini, and Abdal Malik Fajar Alam. “Perbandingan Kebijakan Pendidikan Antara Negara Korea Selatan Dan Korea Utara.” DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, vol. 3, no. 1, 2024, pp. 29–35.

KEDI. A Window into Korean Education. 2019, p. 25.

Lee, J. (2001). Education Policy in the Republic of Korea: Building Block or Stumbling Block? (p. 27).

Rahayu, Teguh Imam. “Teori Pembangunan Dunia Ke-3 Dalam Teori Modernisasi Sub Teori Harrod-Domar.” Gema Eksos, vol. 6, no. 1, 2010, pp. 69–82.

Rompas, Welson Y. “Analisis Tentang Teori Modernisasi.” Karya Ilmiah., 2009, pp. 1–24.

Rompas, Welson Y. “Analisis Tentang Teori Modernisasi.” Karya Ilmiah., 2009, pp. 1–24.

Ryang, J. M., and Lee Woojin. Korean Education System. no. 1, 2018, p. 64.

Setiawan, Ferry. “Pengaruh Teori Pembangunan Dunia Ke -3 Dalam Teori Modernisasi Terhadap Administrasi Pembangunan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan, vol. 8, no. 2, 2019, pp. 59–60.

Solikatun, et al. “Kemiskinan Dalam Pembangunan.” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, vol. 3, no. 1, 1945, pp. 70–90.

Wardani, Marlina Ramadhanti. “Strategi Pemerintah Korea Selatan Dalam Mengatasi Krisis Demografi Di Era Moon Jae In.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 6, no. 11, 2018, pp. 10–27.

Zafirovski, Milan. “(Pre-)Capitalism and the ‘Spirit’ of Protestantism—the Max Weber Reverse Thesis of Economic Conditions of Calvinism.” Social Epistemology, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 89–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2014.884182.