STUDI IN SILICO POTENSI ANTIKANKER PADA SENYAWA METABOLIT SEKUNDER BUAH MAKASSAR

Main Article Content

Rizqi Trianita Fariha
Safirda Syafa Yuhandiana
Zubaidah
Muhammad Fadhil Pratomo
Auliani Ginantika Pertiwi

Abstract

Kanker adalah penyakit dengan angka kematian tinggi akibat pertumbuhan tidak normal sel. Terapi kanker saat ini belum dapat menyembuhkan kanker seutuhnya sehingga perlu alternatif obat dari tumbuhan. Buah Makassar (Brucea javanica (L.) Merr.) diduga memiliki aktivitas antikanker. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode in silico, berupa penambatan molekuler menggunakan Autodock Tools 4.2, skrining farmakofor menggunakan LigandScout 4.4.5, pemeriksaan terhadap aturan lipinski serta prediksi absorbsi, distribusi, metabolisme, dan toksisitas dengan pre-ADMET. Selain itu, dilakukan uji toksisitas menggunakan Brine Shrimp Lethality Test (BSLT) metode vial dan microplate dengan hasil LC50 pada 198,07 ppm (microplate) dan 82,22 ppm (vial). Berdasarkan penambatan molekuler, nilai Binding Energy terbesar dimiliki bruceolide (-8,08 kkal/mol). Berdasarkan skrining farmakofor, nilai fit score terbesar diperoleh bruceine D (45,06).


Kata kunci: Kanker, Brucea javanica (L.) Merr, Studi in Silico, BLST

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizqi Trianita Fariha, Safirda Syafa Yuhandiana, Zubaidah, Muhammad Fadhil Pratomo, & Auliani Ginantika Pertiwi. (2024). STUDI IN SILICO POTENSI ANTIKANKER PADA SENYAWA METABOLIT SEKUNDER BUAH MAKASSAR. Medic Nutricia : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 4(3), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5455/nutricia.v4i3.4847
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rizqi Trianita Fariha, Universitas Padjadjaran

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran

Safirda Syafa Yuhandiana, Universitas Padjadjaran

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran

Zubaidah, Universitas Padjadjaran

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran

Muhammad Fadhil Pratomo, Universitas Padjadjaran

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran

Auliani Ginantika Pertiwi, Universitas Padjadjaran

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran

References

(1) Andi Mushawwir. 2014. Biokimia Nutrisi. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Padjadjaran. Sumedang.

(2) Arba, M. 2019. Buku Ajar Farmasi Komputasi. Yogyakarta : Deepublish.

(3) Arba, M., Arfan, Trisnawati, A., dan Kurniawati, D. 2020. Pemodelan Farmakofor untuk Identifikasi Inhibitor Heat Shock Proteins90 (HSP-90). Jurnal Farmasi Galenika. Vol. 6(2) : 229-236.

(4) Arba, M., Nur-Hidayat, A., Surantaadmaja, S. I., dan Tjahjono, D. H. 2018. Pharmacophore-based Virtual Screening for Identifying β5 Subunit Inhibitor of 20S Proteasome. Computational Biology and Chemistry. Vol. 77 : 64-71.

(5) Arafah, A.B.R. and Notobroto, H.B., 2017. Faktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Ibu Rumah Tangga Melakukan Pemeriksaan Payudara Sendiri (SADARI). The Indonesian Journal of Public Health, 12(2), pp.143–153.

(6) Braga, A., Paes, F., Machado, S., Carta, M., Nardi, A., Silva, A., 2013. Comorbidity of Depression and Anxiety: Association with Poor Quality of Life in Type 1 and 2 Diabetic Patients. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health. 9: 136-141.

(7) Jia L, Song Q, Zhou C, Li X, Pi L, Ma X, Li H, Lu X, Shen Y. 2016. Dihydroartemisinin as a Putative STAT3 Inhibitor, Suppresses the Growth of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Targeting Jak2/STAT3 Signaling. PLoS One. Vol. 11(1).

(8) Kaffi S, Subekti,dan Zulfahmi. 2011. Penggunaan Minyak dari Buah makasar (Brucea Javanica(L.) Merr.) sebagai Feed Additive Organik pada Broiler. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing (Bidang Pertanian).

(9) Kastritis PL and Bonvin AMJJ. 2012. On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 10: 20120835.

(10) Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Situasi penyakit kanker. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2015.

(11) Kumalo, H. M., dan Soliman, M. E. 2015. Per-Residue Energy Footprints-Based Pharmacophore Modeling as an Enhanced in Silico Approach in Drug Discovery: A Case Study on the Identification of Novel b-Secretase 1 (BACE1) Inhibitors as AntiAlzheimer Agents. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. Vol. 9(1) : 175-189.

(12) Meyer, B.N., Ferrigni, N.R., Putnam, J.E., Jacobsen, L.B., Nichols, D.E., dan McLaughin, J.L., (1982), Brine Shrimp: A Convenient General Bioassay for Active Plant Constituent, Planta Medica. 45:31-34.

(13) Pratama, M. R. F. 2016. Studi in silico Metabolit Sekunder Brucea javanica sebagai Inhibitor EGFR Mutan T790M-L858R- V948R. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kefarmasian. Banjarmasin.

(14) Rekha, U. V., Anita, M., Bhuminathan, S., dan Sadhana, K. 2020. Molecular docking analysis of human JAK2 with compounds from tomatoes. Bioinformation. Vol. 16(10) : 742-747.

(15) Ravindranath, P. A., Forli, S., Goodsell, D. S., Olson, A. J., & Sanner, M. F. (2015). AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(12), e1004586.

(16) Sen M, Pollock NI, Black J, DeGrave KA, Wheeler S, Freilino ML, Joyce S, Lui VW, Zeng Y, Chiosea SI, Grandis JR. 2015. JAK Kinase Inhibition Abrogates STAT3 Activation and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tumor Growth. Neoplasia. Vol. 17(3) : 256-264.

(17) Trott, O., & Olson, A. 2009. Software news and update autodock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 0, 1-7.

(18) Zhao, J., Cao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Exploring the Computational Methods for Protein- Ligand Binding Site Prediction. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 8, 417-426.