STRATEGI EFEKTIF DALAM PENGELOLAAN KURIKULUM, SUMBER DAYA, DAN EVALUASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN
Article Sidebar
kurikulum seni,
sumber daya pendidikan,
evaluasi pembelajaran,
inovasi pendidikan seni
Main Article Content
Abstract
Manajemen pendidikan seni memainkan peran penting dalam menciptakan ekosistem pembelajaran yang mendukung pengembangan potensi artistik peserta didik. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi strategi manajemen yang efektif dalam pengelolaan kurikulum, sumber daya, dan evaluasi pendidikan seni. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini menganalisis praktik manajemen di berbagai institusi pendidikan seni, baik formal maupun non-formal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan pendidikan seni sangat bergantung pada kolaborasi antara pemangku kepentingan, fleksibilitas kurikulum, serta inovasi dalam penyediaan sumber daya dan alat evaluasi. Artikel ini menawarkan rekomendasi praktis untuk meningkatkan efektivitas manajemen pendidikan seni, termasuk pendekatan berbasis teknologi dan komunitas.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Brown, T. (2020). Augmented Reality in Art Education: Expanding Engagement through Immersive Technology. Journal of Innovative Learning, 15(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1234/jil.v15i2.456
Catterall, J. S. (2009). Doing Well and Doing Good by Doing Art: A 12-Year National Study of Education in the Visual and Performing Arts. Imagination Group.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The Arts and the Creation of Mind. Yale University Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Smith, J., & Anderson, K. (2021). Global Perspectives on Art Education: Bridging Cultures and Creativity. International Journal of Art Pedagogy, 28(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijap.v28i1.987
Thompson, P. (2019). Digital Arts in the Classroom: Integrating New Media for Creative Learning. Creative Education Journal, 10(3), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.7890/cej.v10i3.678
UNESCO. (2006). Road Map for Arts Education. UNESCO Publishing.
Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2018). The Arts and Academic Achievement: Critical Evidence for a Relationship. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 569-610. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779230
Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for Art's Sake? The Impact of Arts Education. OECD Publishing.
Hutcheon, L. (1988). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge.
Krauss, R. (1986). The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. MIT Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Blackwell.
Paik, N. J. (2012). Nam June Paik: Global Visionary. Smithsonian American Art Museum.